Montana Secretary of State Says New Non-Presidential Independent Petition Deadline is May 29

On May 29, Montana Secretary of State Linda McCulloch told the press that the Montana independent petition deadline (for candidates running for office other than President) will be May 29. As previously noted, late on Friday, May 25, a U.S. District Court had invalidated the statutory March deadline.

Obviously, for the Secretary of State to set May 29 as the new deadline, the very day that the public became aware of the court decision, makes it impossible for any potential independent candidates to take advantage of the victory in 2012. The March petition deadline had been passed by the 2007 session of the legislature. The law in effect before 2007 said the deadline should be one week before the primary. The Secretary of State feels the proper course of action is to reinstate the deadline that would have been in effect, if the 2007 legislature had not acted. The Secretary of State says the Attorney General agrees with her.

During the period 1968 through this year, there have been 51 instances around the nation when a petition deadline was declared unconstitutional. No state other than Montana ever set a new deadline, by administrative means, using the Secretary of State’s method. On the other hand, since there are no known individuals who have expressed a desire to be independent candidates (for office other than President) in Montana this year, the matter may be moot. It is extremely likely that the 2013 session of the legislature will pass a new deadline.


  1. Demo Rep · · Reply

    A govt of LAWS – or arbitrary tyrant stuff dreamed up for the moment ???

    How EVIL dangerous is it for a STATE legislature NOT to be in session watching the STATE executive branch especially ???

    From a while back — the EVIL Elephants after the Civil War made many LOW population western States — due to the U.S.A. Senate gerrymander math — i.e. to try and pack the Senate with Elephants for as long as possible.

    Abolish the Senate and even many of the LOW population States (i.e. merge them – to be big enough to have a full time legislative body — checking on the need for each law and watching the executive and judicial branches).

    Obviously the very largest population States should be divided – CA, TX, etc.

    P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: