Vermont June 14 Petition Deadline Proves Deadly for Green, Constitution, Justice Parties

The 2009 session of the Vermont legislature moved the independent candidate petition deadline from September to June. This move has reduced choices on this year’s November general election. The Justice Party, the Constitution Party, and the Green Party, all made serious attempts to obtain the needed 1,000 signatures in time for the June 14 deadline, but all three failed. The only presidential petition that succeeded was the petition of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. The problem is not entirely collecting 1,000 valid signatures; it is turning them in to the town clerks and having the town clerks verify the signatures in time for the Secretary of State’s deadline.

The Libertarian Party, Liberty Union, and the Progressive Party were already ballot-qualified and did not need to petition. The Progressive Party generally stays out of the presidential election, so, without legal action, the only choices on the Vermont November ballot for President will be: President Obama, Mitt Romney, Gary Johnson, Peta Lindsay, and whomever Liberty Union nominates. Generally, Liberty Union nominates whomever the Socialist Party nominates. If that pattern occurs this year, then Stewart Alexander will be on the ballot.

Five choices on the presidential ballot is unusually low for Vermont. That is the smallest number of choices for President in Vermont since 1972. A lawsuit is currently pending in the Vermont Supreme Court against the June 14 petition deadline, but it is not clear that that court will rule in time for anyone to get relief. The plaintiff, Jerry Trudell, had tried to be an independent candidate for Congress in 2010. Because that election is in the past, there had been no request for an expedited hearing in the Vermont Supreme Court.


  1. Reed Ebarb · · Reply

    It’s story’s like this that make me glad we have easy ballot access in Louisiana.

  2. upstartgreen · · Reply

    Help the Green Party fight restrictive Ballot laws through the Jill Stein campaign. Go to
    and make a donation

  3. mbelleville · · Reply

    Is there an appeal process or is this a dead deal for these three parties?

  4. Richard Winger · · Reply

    #3, there are two possibilities. It is conceivable that the Vermont Supreme Court would let these parties intervene in the Trudell case. Or the three parties, or any one of them, could file a new lawsuit. There are 6 states in which June petition deadlines have been held to be too early. Only two of those are reported, however: (1) the 9th circuit Arizona decision Nader v Brewer, issued in 2008; (2) the US District Court South Dakota decision Nader v Hazeltine in 2000.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: