Two Ohio Voters Challenge Gary Johnson Ballot Status

On August 24, two Ohio voters, Kelly Mills and Cynthia Rees, filed a challenge to the placement of Gary Johnson on the Ohio general election ballot. The Ohio Libertarian Party and the Johnson campaign were not informed of this until August 31.

The basis for the challenge is that Ohio law says candidates cannot get on the general election “by nominating petition” if he or she “seeks a party nomination for an office or position at a primary by declaration of candidacy.” 3513.04. This is a frivolous challenge. Gary Johnson did not get on the general election ballot in Ohio “by nominating petition.” He is on the November ballot because the Ohio Libertarian Party has been ballot-qualified ever since 2008. People who get on the general election “by nominating petition” are independent candidates, and Gary Johnson is not an independent candidate.

To get around this problem, the objectors point out that the Libertarian Party would have got on the ballot by “nominating petition” if a court hadn’t put it on the ballot. But, the petition that would have been used to put the Libertarian Party on the ballot if it had needed one is not called a “nominating petition”; instead it is “a petition in which voters declare their intention to organize a political party.” The petition to put a party on the Ohio ballot does not list any candidates; it just mentions the party, so plainly it is not a “nominating petition.” After a newly-qualifying party in Ohio gets on the ballot, the party nominates its candidates.

Another weakness in the challenge is that Gary Johnson didn’t run in the Ohio Republican presidential primary. The challenge acknowledges this, but says he ran in some other state presidential primaries.

The challenge says the “sore loser” law is supposed to be construed broadly, but the only example relates to another law that doesn’t have anything to with election law. The truth is that Ohio courts have interpreted the “sore loser” law, as applied to presidential candidates, very narrowly. For example, in 1992, Lyndon LaRouche appeared on the Ohio Democratic presidential primary and then petitioned to be on in November as an independent presidential candidate. The Secretary of State refused to list him as an independent, but the Ohio Court of Appeals, in Brown v Taft, 92AP-1267, decision of September 18, 1992, construed the sore loser law for president very narrowly. It said LaRouche should be on the November ballot because, technically, he didn’t file a petition to be on the Democratic presidential primary ballot. Instead, it said his candidates for Delegate to the Democratic convention filed the petitions, and they were the true candidates. Afterward, the Ohio legislature amended the sore loser law to cover people whose names appear on the Ohio presidential primary ballot, but the legislature did not amend the law to cover minor party presidential candidates. The law still just relates to independent presidential candidates.

Still another flaw with the challenge is that the Ohio Secretary of State put Gary Johnson on the ballot on July 12. One wonders about the justification for waiting until August 24 for that decision to be challenged. The Secretary of State will adjudicate this challenge at 10 a.m. on September 5, Wednesday.


  1. Bill Wood · · Reply

    Republicans must not have much faith in Mitt Romney’s ability to earn enough votes to beat Obama. This is pretty sad.

  2. Robert McHugh · · Reply

    These folks in Ohio are just plain sad.

  3. Curt Boyd · · Reply

    Seems like Republicans are afraid of Gary Johnson like Democrats were of Ralph Nader!

  4. This one is almost laughable. Hopefully this gets thrown out rather quickly. And I agree with @1 and @3, the Romney camp must be afraid of their candidate not being good enough.

  5. Jed Siple · · Reply

    I will never, ever, vote for another Republican as long as I live. Wow.

  6. Georg Scheffer · · Reply

    Very sad that Republicans are opting to get the Libertarian party of Ohio out of the ballot at all cost. Are they afraid that a third party will demonstrate to the public, once and for all, that a “democratically” elected administrator (a president) does not have any legitimacy to dictate people how they need to live their lives? let alone steal people’s money with a federal taxation…

  7. Patti Diaz · · Reply

    I can’t believe I was thinking of voting for Romney to get Obama out of the White House. I’ll never vote for a Republican again!

  8. Carol Springman · · Reply

    I am angry and it is obvious that the RNC is trying to limit the voters’ choices by pulling this dirty maneuver now so that even if he wins he could still miss the ballot printing dates.

  9. Kevin Knedler · · Reply

    Looking forward to the hearing in Columbus, Ohio

    I hope you have noticed the strategic attacks on multiple LP state affiliates around the country.

    This is our modern day GOP. So much for first amendment. We best not lose that precious freedom.

    @ # 7. You are NOT alone in your feelings.

  10. I live in Wv and I am voting for Gary Johnson. I know I dont belong to a “key state” but I urge everyone, for once, to put your parties aside and vote on the candidates solutions to the important issues. Gary Johnson has the mathmatical chance of winning, has the experience and track record to back him up, not to mention he is the only one that is promoting peace.

  11. […] nominee Gary Johnson is now facing problems in Ohio while still awaiting the outcome of rulings in Pennsylvania, Michigan, […]

  12. […] nominee Gary Johnson is now facing problems in Ohio while still awaiting the outcome of rulings in Pennsylvania, Michigan, […]

  13. […] nominee Gary Johnson is now facing problems in Ohio while still awaiting the outcome of rulings in Pennsylvania, Michigan, […]

  14. Bob McDonell · · Reply

    The DNC did this to the Green party. The DNC/RNC seem to be “uniquely” united in keeping 3rd parties out of the picture. The more the RNC fights us Libertarians with dirty tactics the more it gets out to the general public at the RNC’s expense!

  15. Kevin Knedler · · Reply

    So I ask you. Just who are these two ladies and who supplies the money for their pay checks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: